I agree 100% that the deep clean method could stand to be updated. When crabs appear stressed afterward, then something needs to be changed. I do think it can be done well, though.
I agree that the deep clean method is a valid one, just not necessarily the best method. As I said, adequate does not always mean optimal.
You know, I think this is where I disagree with some of my fellow fishkeepers as well as my fellow crab keepers. If we take this to its logical conclusion, then we would have to agree that what would truly be
optimal for our fish or crabs would be for them to be in their native environment. My angelfish would be living in an Amazon river instead of my 30 gallon tank, and my purple pinchers would be roaming the beaches of South Florida. If that is true, then anything we can give them in captivity is less than optimal, in the strictest sense of the word. Now, stick with me here, because I’m not as heretical as I may sound at this point.

I’m NOT saying that anything in captivity is as good as anything else, just because it’s not nature. There are certainly setups that would cause stress, disease, death, or deformity. Aside from these factors however, if we establish that any captive setup is by definition not as good as being in the wild, then it becomes merely a matter of degree. Speaking strictly of size, we as a crabbing community have agreed that a 10 gallon tank can be adequately maintained for our crabs. A 20 gallon would be better and a 55 better than that. But a 10 gallon meets their needs (assuming we have the right number and size of crabs, good conditions, etc.) This same logic can be applied to more than just tank size—it can be extended to substrate, tank setup, vivarium vs. deep clean, etc. My point is that as long as all of their needs are provided for and they are healthy and “happyâ€