hermieluv1 wrote:I haven't been at it long, but I wonder if the in-tank heater might be a problem. We all use side-mounted under tank heaters (people who have reptiles use them under the tank...hermits, needing at least 6" of sand/substrate, can't have all that heat under them or they will cook and the sand will dry out, so we put them on the sides of the tank.
I have not put much thinking into the heating part yet. Basic idea is that as long as tyne tank is isolated and I have control over ventilation basically any type of heat-source would do as long as it doesn't have to transfer heat
through the substrate (thats whats drying it out). I figured i just get a heat mat or heat tape and build that into the sides of the thing. For my prototype i have a old style lightbulb encapsulated in a small housing which transfers heat out into two copper-plates (nothing living in there, so I can use as toxic materials I want for experimentation). This to sort of simulate the kind of heat source a heat mat or tape is. With holes in the housing for the lamp I also created a natural airflow heating the air as it passed through. I even had plans on warming water in there because its so much more efficient than warming air. I wanted to be able to experiment with this kind of things to get a handle on how to best do it.
hermieluv1 wrote:I would like to see what you come up wioth for the humidity factor. They need humidity of around 80%, and to get that, most of us use little tubs of damp moss, plus either mist the tank a couple of times a time, have bubblers in our pools, etc. Some use humidifiers piped into the tank (expensive). I always thought there might be a better way!
I started experimenting with this. Goal was to come up with some sort of contraption that was not too complicated that could be used to control humidity in my prototype box. Even if I got to a point where I could control temperature and set humidity to anywhere between 40 and 80 and it would keep it there, this is not relevant for a real enclosure where you have all this water and moist substrate that adds to the humidity. Just limiting the ventilation should be enough for keeping humidity I think, no real need to actually humidify the air further.
Since I plan on having flowing water (waterfall, stream) I should not really have any problem with humidity, starting to design a humidifier was probably wasted time for my particular build, but I learned a lot about how it works. Bottom line for humidifying air by forced evaporation is simply
wet surface-area and
air-flow. My last design for a DIY humidifier was half of a 2L Coke PET-bottle full of wet pebbles of the the light, ceramic brown type you use for plants + a fan (computer chassi-type) blowing air through the whole thing. If you can keep the pebbles wet and got room for it inside the enclosure, thats pretty effective. My guess is that any added airflow over
any wet or moist surfaces will be highly effective in driving humidity up in a tank. This will off course dry that surface, which might be a problem. You still would need to get water
into the tank, but you would get a much more effective evaporation.
When I took a step back, I realized that I should have started with the water-system instead.
IF you going to have flowing water, I suspect both the heating and the humidification can be based around that fact. The thing is, if you showed my PET-bottle to a aquarist chances are he would say it was a strange attempt at building a
trickle filter. A trickle filter is a type of biological filtration for aquariums. One of the listed downsides of these filters are water-evaporation, that is, they tend to put a lot of water into the air... If you showed the same thing to a engineer working at a nuclear power-plant he would identify it as a model of a
cooling-tower
Funny how the same thing can be different things depending on your POV.