So, we cannot use "Purpureus" to name this "Indonesian" purple species!?JediMasterThrash wrote:If you closely compare the two crabs to other known species, I'd say that the Indonesian Purpureus looks a lot like a purple variabilis, and the Okinawan Purpureus looks a lot like a purple rugosus.
They definitely have different body structures. They are similar in color only. In fact I'd say they aren't even similar in color, the indonesian is more purple and the okinawan is more blue. But of course color is affected by many variables.
For a single generation only, and the offspring are sterile, so from a popualtion and species POV, they are really not accomplishing any breeding in the functional sense.JediMasterThrash wrote: Donkeys and Horses look different but can still breed.
They cannot breed true and produce reproductively viable offspring according to most definitions where the issue is part of the species criteria at all."Species" classification is somewhat arbitrarily defined, and it is not always true that different species can't breed.
Initially I would assume that the pics may not be representative of the species at all. Ideally there would be shots from multiple angles of several animals from both areas - otherwise it is pretty tough to draw any conclusions. Of course a little DNA work wouldn't hurt either!Assuming the variation is not just due to "age" factors, I would be inclined to think they are a different species. I would be more inclined to think one is a variation of violascens or rugosus rather than both being variations of purpureus. But someone would need to do some scientific analysis on some samples to know for sure.
Donkeys and horses don't produce viable offspring thoughJediMasterThrash wrote:Well we don't actually know if they can breed or not. Donkeys and Horses look different but can still breed.
"Species" classification is somewhat arbitrarily defined, and it is not always true that different species can't breed.
Assuming the variation is not just due to "age" factors, I would be inclined to think they are a different species. I would be more inclined to think one is a variation of violascens or rugosus rather than both being variations of purpureus. But someone would need to do some scientific analysis on some samples to know for sure.
and in my biology class if two animals can breed in the wild naturally and produced viable offspring and had similar characteristics in behavior and appearance they were the same species if they couldn't breed because they were separated geologically that would make them a different species. So I'd definitely consider them separate species.
Only because they have as different number of chromosomes. Horses have 64 chromosomes while donkeys only have 62. Mules have 63 chromosomes and so cannot interbreed. (What's really neat is that female mules can sometimes indeed be fertile, but only if they breed with a full horse or a full donkey. So even though they're 50% donkey and 50% horse, if they're bred to a 100% horse their foal will be 100% horse.)Hermitcrazy wrote:Donkeys and horses don't produce viable offspring though
You can see the 2nd photo, there is no ridge (///) on big claw.Spiral wrote:These are from the Indian Ocean. old pics
i do not understand why some of them have red inner antennae,
where the middle segment should be grey, like a rug
The 1st one may be only a rug?Mokulele_Hawai'i wrote:However, I also have Indonesian blueberries with ridges or stitch mark on the BP:
.... while some of them without the stitch marks ( especially the jumbo/large ones - the stitches seem to be obscured by the granules or hair setae on the BP ):
I still believe that the Indonesian blueberry is still C.purpureus but belongs to diffferent sub-species. The antennae are really similar to the Japanese blueberry.
And it's true - some of their body parts resemble C.variabilis.
